Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

Latest trends and developments in commercial litigation.

open menu close menu

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

  • Home
  • About us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Securities Litigation
    • Technology and New Media

Higher Education Class Action Litigation Trends

By Matthew Fleming, Marina Sampson, Chloe Snider, and Dennis Wong
June 3, 2020
  • Class Action
  • General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Class actions proceedings in the US and Canada have also targeted post-secondary institutions in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, seeking compensation for school years shortened by COVID-19 or educational experiences impacted by COVID-19, reflecting amounts paid for tuition and ancillary fees. While many dozens of these education-related class actions as a result of COVID-19 have been commenced in the US to date, such class actions have been sparser in Canada.

In Canada, the following education-related class actions have been commenced as a result of COVID-19:

  • A class action against a BC post-secondary institution for the partial refund of parking permits as a result of campus closures, alleging the frustration of parking contracts due to COVID-19, breaches of parking contracts, and unjust enrichment.
  • A class action against 15 post-secondary institutions in Québec seeking the refund of tuition for the portion of their semester affected by COVID-19. According to a CTV news article, the students claim that with the cancellation of in-person classes across the province on March 13, 2020, they lost access to services like libraries and training seminars, and while some classes were moved online, others were cancelled entirely.

The following is a sampling of recent education-related class actions that have been commenced as a result of COVID-19 in the US:

  • A class action against a private university in Phoenix, Arizona, seeking the refund of a pro rated portion of on-campus tuition, student fees, and the cost of room and board that the university has allegedly not provided and not adequately refunded. The claim alleges that due to the transition of in-person courses to an online-only format and the limited availability of the university’s on-campus facilities, the university has not delivered the educational services, facilities, access, experience and/or opportunities that the plaintiff and the putative class contracted and paid for. The claim also alleges unjust enrichment and conversion.
  • A class action against an Ivy League university, seeking the refund of a pro rated portion of tuition and fees, proportionate to the amount of time that remained in the 2020 spring semester when classes moved online and campus services ceased being provided. While the representative plaintiff is a graduate student at the university, the proposed class includes all people who paid the 2020 spring semester 2020 and/or fees for in-person educational services that the university allegedly failed to provide and whose tuition and fees have not been refunded. The claim alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment and conversion.
  • A class action against a post-secondary institution in New York, seeking the refund of a pro rated portion of tuition and fees, proportionate to the amount of time that remained in the 2020 spring semester when classes moved online and campus services ceased being provided. The representative plaintiff is a parent of an undergraduate student enrolled in a program who allegedly relies extensively on in-person instruction, laboratory access, meaningful student presentations, peer collaboration and access to university facilities. The claim alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conversion.
  • A class action against a post-secondary institution in Pennsylvania, seeking the refund of a pro rated portion of tuition and fees, proportionate to the amount of time that remained in the 2020 spring semester when classes moved online and campus services ceased being provided. Like other tuition and fee refund claims, the claim alleges that the tuition and fees for in-person instruction are higher than those for online institutions, because such costs cover not just academic instruction but a different school experience. The claim alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conversion.
  • A class action  against a university , seeking the refund on tuition and fees paid for services, facilities, access and/or opportunities not delivered. In addition to allegations that the putative class have been deprived of the benefits of on-campus learning, the claim alleges that the “value of any degree issued on the basis of online or satisfactory/unsatisfactory classes” is diminished. The claim alleges breach of contract and unjust enrichment.
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Matthew Fleming

About Matthew Fleming

Matthew Fleming is a partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group of Dentons’ Toronto office and is the Co-Lead of the Firm’s global Financial Services Litigation group. His practice focuses on commercial litigation, including securities litigation, class actions, product liability and professional liability matters.

All posts Full bio

Marina Sampson

About Marina Sampson

Marina is a commercial litigator and a partner in the firm’s Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution practice group. Marina is an experienced class action lawyer. She is also a member of the firm’s Environmental, Renewable Energy and Energy Law Practice Group. She is the National Co-Lead of the firm’s Products Liability Group.

All posts Full bio

Chloe Snider

About Chloe Snider

Chloe Snider is a partner in Dentons’ Litigation and Dispute Resolution and Transformative Technologies groups. Her practice focuses on litigating complex commercial disputes and assisting clients manage risk. She is a strategic and critical legal thinker who works efficiently to develop practical solutions for her clients.

All posts Full bio

Dennis Wong

About Dennis Wong

Dennis Wong is an associate in our Litigation and Dispute Resolution group at Dentons Canada in Toronto. His practice involves a variety of complex corporate, commercial and civil litigation matters.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Class Action

La Cour supérieure rejette une action collective au mérite visant des conclusions uniquement de nature injonctive

By Erica Shadeed
  • Class Action

Goodbye Waiver of Tort, Hello Motions to Strike: Key Takeaways from Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock

By Matthew Fleming, Marina Sampson, Chloe Snider, and Susan Fridlyand
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Litigation

The impact of the coronavirus crisis on the franchise industry and what franchisors and franchisees can do to survive

By Babette Märzheuser-Wood and Helen Fotinos

About Dentons

Dentons is the world’s largest law firm, delivering quality and value to clients around the globe. Dentons is a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Brand Index, a BTI Client Service 30 Award winner and recognized by prominent business and legal publications for its innovations in client service, including founding Nextlaw Labs and the Nextlaw Global Referral Network. Dentons’ polycentric approach and world-class talent challenge the status quo to advance client interests in the communities in which we live and work. www.dentons.com.

Dentons digital

Twitter

Categories

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Arbitration
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Covid-19
  • General
  • International Arbitration
  • Mining
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Securities Litigation
  • Technology and new media

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2021 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site