Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

Latest trends and developments in commercial litigation.

open menu close menu

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

  • Home
  • About us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Privacy Litigation
    • Professional Liability
    • Securities Litigation
    • Technology and New Media

Significant development in the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Canada: The case of Lanfer v Eilers

By Chloe Snider
April 6, 2022
  • Commercial Litigation
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

On March 3, 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal from the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s decision in Lanfer v Eilers, 2021 BCCA 241 (Lanfer). The case concerns the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments at common law and the main issue on appeal to the Supreme Court will be whether prior case law barring the recognition and enforcement of foreign non-money judgments that affect title to land outside the territory of the foreign court remains good law.

The case and decision

In Lanfer, the plaintiffs (appellants) sought recognition and enforcement of a German judgment that concerned land located in British Columbia by requiring the transfer of title to the land between the parties subject to the order. The German courts ordered the defendant (respondent), Ms. Eilers, to transfer title to the land to the plaintiffs. Ms. Eilers refused to do so and dealt with the land in breach of the terms of the German judgment. The chambers judge dismissed the application, holding that the German order was not capable of recognition and enforcement in British Columbia based on the rule in Duke v Andler, [1932] S.C.R. 734 (Duke).

As set out in Duke, it has traditionally been accepted in private international law that a domestic court would not recognize or enforce a foreign judgment that adjudicated on title to immoveable property located in the domestic court’s territorial jurisdiction (the foreign immovable rule). This formed part of the traditional view that only foreign money judgments could be recognized and enforced in Canada.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal considered whether the German order was offside the foreign immovable rule and the proper scope of that rule where the foreign judgment that affects land outside its territory is an in personam judgment akin to an order for specific performance. In other words, the question concerned whether Duke is, or continues to be, binding authority barring the recognition and enforcement of the German judgment in this case because it indirectly affects title to land.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that Duke was implicitly overruled by developments in case law, including by the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Pro Swing Inc v Elta Golf Inc, 2006 SCC 52 (Pro Swing). In that case, the Supreme Court held that Canadian courts may recognize and enforce foreign non-money judgments provided certain criteria are satisfied. The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that Pro Swing altered the common law principles engaged in the recognition and enforcement of foreign non-money judgments, including foreign in personam orders in the nature of specific performance. In short, the Court of Appeal concluded that Pro Swing has overtaken the salience of the distinction between foreign money and non-money orders, and that the categorical distinction between the enforceability of the different types of orders is no longer good law. Both money and non-money judgments can be recognized and enforced where the appropriate criteria are met. In Lanfer, it was therefore appropriate to enforce the German judgment through a vesting order. The appeal was allowed.

Takeaway

Lanfer is a significant development in the case law surrounding recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. If upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada, this decision will allow courts to enforce non-money judgments concerning immovables, and would continue to pave the way for more complex foreign non-money judgments to be recognized and enforced in Canadian courts.

If you have any questions about this insight, please reach out to Chloe Snider.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Chloe Snider

About Chloe Snider

Chloe Snider is a partner in Dentons’ Litigation and Dispute Resolution and Transformative Technologies groups. Her practice focuses on litigating complex commercial disputes and assisting clients manage risk. She is a strategic and critical legal thinker who works efficiently to develop practical solutions for her clients.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • General
  • Medical Malpractice

The role of expert evidence in professional negligence

By Katherine Martin
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Securities Litigation

Court availability and limitation period suspension during COVID-19

By Gord Tarnowsky, Matthew Fleming, and Nolan Hurlburt
  • Commercial Litigation

New Developments on the oppression remedy and bad faith

By Kelly Osaka

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Arbitration
  • Civil Litigation
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Covid-19
  • Energy
  • Environmental Litigation
  • Estates and Trusts
  • General
  • Government Investigations
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Arbitration
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Mining
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Privacy Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Regulatory
  • Securities Litigation
  • Technology and new media
  • White-Collar Crime

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2022 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site