Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

Latest trends and developments in commercial litigation.

open menu close menu

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

  • Home
  • About us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Judicial Review and Public Law
    • Privacy Litigation
    • Professional Liability
    • Securities Litigation
    • Technology and New Media

No Duty on Insurers to Advise Insured of running Limitation Period

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
May 25, 2017
  • Discoverability
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

​In Usanovic v. Penncorp Life Insurance Company, 2017 ONCA 395, the Court of Appeal for Ontario concluded that an insurer has no obligation to advise the insured about the running of a limitation period as part of its duty of good faith. The Court held that although the parties in an insurance contract owe one another a duty of good faith, it does not amount to a fiduciary duty – the insurer has no obligation to consider “the insured’s interests as paramount.”

While the legislatures of some provinces have imposed a statutory obligation to that effect (B.C. and Alberta), there is no such requirement in Ontario. Whether there should be is a matter for the legislature.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario and on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Discoverability

Limitation Periods and Singular Discrete Oppressive Acts

By Ara Basmadjian
  • Discoverability

Lochner v. Toronto: Discovery does not require knowledge of liability

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability

Court of Appeal for Ontario Addresses the “Appropriate Means” Aspect of the Limitations Analysis

By Robert Kligman

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Acknowledgement
  • Adding a Party
  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Arbitration
  • attempted resolution
  • Civil Litigation
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Covid-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Energy
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • Environmental Litigation
  • Estates and Trusts
  • General
  • Government Investigations
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Arbitration
  • Judicial Review and Public Law
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Mining
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Privacy Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Quarterly privacy litigation digest
  • Regulatory
  • Securities Litigation
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Technology and new media
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods
  • White-Collar Crime

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site