Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

Latest trends and developments in commercial litigation.

open menu close menu

Dentons Commercial Litigation Blog

  • Home
  • About us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
    • Class Action
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Judicial Review and Public Law
    • Privacy Litigation
    • Professional Liability
    • Securities Litigation
    • Technology and New Media

Intrusion upon seclusion is not concerned with dissemination: No privacy breach where lawfully obtained information used to terminate employee

By Sasha Coutu
November 12, 2021
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Privacy
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Wakeling v. Desjardins General Insurance, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the Ontario Superior Court’s decision to strike a claim for intrusion upon seclusion in a motion against an insurer and its counsel. The case is notable for its discussion of the interplay of counsel’s duty to provide information to his or her client about an ongoing proceeding to which it is a party, and the determination of whether information about a case conference is private.

We provide the key highlights of the case, what it means for employers and why dissemination of information is not considered as an intrusion here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Sasha Coutu

About Sasha Coutu

Sasha Coutu is an associate in the Privacy and Cybersecurity group and the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group at Dentons.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Commercial Litigation

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice reaffirms that the statutory oppression remedy cannot be used to advance common wrongful dismissal claims

By Chloe Snider and Changhai Zhu
  • Commercial Litigation

Avoiding the empty bag: How we get our clients paid

Helping clients litigate their disputes is at the heart of what we do as commercial litigators. An important aspect of […]

By Renée Brosseau, Ara Basmadjian, and Meredith Bacal
  • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice

Be careful what you admit: Ontario Court of Appeal rules on Requests to Admit

By Meredith Bacal

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Acknowledgement
  • Adding a Party
  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Arbitration
  • attempted resolution
  • Civil Litigation
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Covid-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Energy
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • Environmental Litigation
  • Estates and Trusts
  • General
  • Government Investigations
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Arbitration
  • Judicial Review and Public Law
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Mining
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Privacy Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Quarterly privacy litigation digest
  • Regulatory
  • Securities Litigation
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Technology and new media
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods
  • White-Collar Crime

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site